By Romeo Razi, CPA — Former IRS Tax Examiner
·Updated September 2, 2026
·Fact-checked against IRS primary sources
Romeo has been quoted on tax matters by U.S. News, Kiplinger, NBC/CNBC (twice), and Realtor.com, and writes for Intuit's Tax Pro Center. More about Romeo →
The short answer: The IRS has two programs that remove penalties entirely — First-Time Abatement (FTA), often called "IRS one-time forgiveness" in everyday searches, and Reasonable Cause. Both result in the same thing: penalty removal. Most people who qualify never request either one. A single phone call or written request — made by you directly, or by an enrolled agent, CPA, or attorney authorized to represent you before the IRS — can eliminate thousands of dollars in penalties, and in 2026, the IRS began applying FTA automatically for qualifying returns. If you have a penalty and a clean prior compliance history, you almost certainly qualify.
| Development | Date | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| Besicorp Group, Inc. v. Commissioner (2nd Cir.) | June 29, 2026 | A genuinely new penalty defense: the IRS must prove a supervisor approved your penalty in writing before it can collect that penalty via lien or levy — even if your underlying liability was already decided. If you're facing collection on an old penalty, this is worth raising alongside FTA or reasonable cause, not instead of them. |
| Automatic Exemption from Penalty (AEP) announced (IR-2026-83) | July 8, 2026 | The IRS is replacing First-Time Abatement with automatic relief during return processing, fully effective for returns due on or after January 1, 2027. During the transition, you may still get a penalty notice and need to request FTA the old way. Full AEP guide → |
Also new: behind on solo 401(k) Form 5500-EZ filings? There's a separate $500 fix — see the 5500-EZ penalty guide →
Most guides describe this as a two-option choice — First-Time Abatement or Reasonable Cause. There's actually a third, separate path that gets overlooked because it's usually buried as a footnote inside reasonable-cause explanations. Here's how the three compare:
| First-Time Abatement (FTA / AEP) | Reasonable Cause | Erroneous Written Advice | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it requires | Clean compliance history for the prior 3 years, all returns filed, tax paid or arranged | A specific circumstance beyond your control, plus ordinary business care and prudence | A written question to the IRS, a written wrong answer, and reliance that caused the penalty |
| Proof needed | None — it's administrative, not fact-based | Documentation of the event (medical records, death certificate, disaster records, etc.) | Copies of your written question and the IRS's written response |
| How to request | Phone call, or automatic under AEP for qualifying 2025+ returns | Written letter or Form 843 to the IRS Service Center | Form 843, with the written correspondence attached |
| Applies to | One tax period per request | Any period where the circumstance applies; can be used for multiple years | The specific period the erroneous advice affected |
| Best for | A single clean year with an isolated penalty | A documented life event that disrupted compliance | Cases where you can prove the IRS itself caused the error, in writing |
These aren't mutually exclusive in the way people assume — see the note on sequencing in the First-Time Abatement section below. If more than one path could apply, which one you lead with can matter.
The IRS assesses penalties automatically through its computer systems. Nobody reviews whether you deserve one. The three most common penalties are:
These penalties also accrue interest from the original due date. Interest compounds daily. On a $100,000 balance, you could be looking at $25,000 in failure-to-file penalties, $25,000 in failure-to-pay penalties, and years of interest — before anyone from the IRS has even talked to you.
"The failure-to-file penalty is the one that surprises people most. They think it starts when the IRS finds out they didn't file. It doesn't. It starts the day after the return was due, even if you filed an extension and missed that deadline too. Filing the return — even if you can't pay — is always the first move. The penalty stops accruing the day you file."
You won't find the phrase "one-time forgiveness" in any IRS publication — the official name is First-Time Abatement (FTA), and it's the most common way people search for it. It's an administrative waiver the IRS grants to taxpayers with a clean compliance history. It requires no proof of hardship, no special circumstances, and no lengthy explanation. If you qualify, the IRS is required to grant it.
"The name 'First-Time Abatement' is slightly misleading — it's not just for people who have never had a penalty before. You qualify as long as you haven't had a penalty for the same type in the prior three years. Someone who had a penalty in 2018 and then stayed clean through 2021 would qualify for FTA on a 2022 penalty. Most practitioners know this, but most taxpayers don't. The IRS won't tell you."
FTA can be requested by phone or in writing. For many cases, a phone call to the IRS at the number on your notice is sufficient. State clearly: "I'm calling to request first-time abatement of the [failure to file / failure to pay] penalty for tax year [XXXX] under IRM 20.1.1.3.6.1." The IRS representative should be able to process it on the call.
This call doesn't have to be you personally. An enrolled agent, CPA, or attorney can make it on your behalf — but only once a Form 2848 (Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative) is on file with the IRS for that tax year and penalty type. Without it, the IRS won't discuss your account with anyone but you.
Starting with 2025 returns filed in 2026, the IRS began applying FTA automatically for qualifying filers, meaning you may not need to call at all. For prior years, you still need to request it.
Important: FTA only removes penalties for one tax period. If you have penalties across multiple years, you may need to apply for FTA on one year and reasonable cause on others. This is where strategy matters — applying FTA to the wrong year can waste it.
One thing worth knowing before you decide which to request: the two aren't mutually exclusive in the way people assume. If you ask for reasonable cause and the IRS's review shows you actually qualify for FTA instead, the IRS is supposed to apply FTA and preserve your reasonable cause argument for use in a different year. In practice, that means when you're not sure which applies, leading with reasonable cause and letting the IRS route you to FTA if you qualify can be the safer sequencing — rather than using up your FTA eligibility on a year where reasonable cause might have worked too.
Worth noting on terminology: some guides use "penalty forgiveness" as an umbrella term covering this path too, not just FTA's "one-time forgiveness." The IRS doesn't use either phrase officially for either program — but if you've seen "IRS penalty forgiveness" attached to a reasonable-cause discussion, this is what it's referring to.
If you don't qualify for FTA — or if you have penalties across multiple years — Reasonable Cause relief allows the IRS to remove penalties when you can demonstrate that the failure was due to circumstances beyond your control and that you exercised ordinary business care and prudence.
"Computer or system issues" is a narrower category than it sounds — it covers things like an IRS e-file rejection you couldn't resolve before the deadline despite timely, repeated attempts, or a documented outage on the IRS's own Direct Pay or EFTPS system on the day you tried to pay. It generally does not cover your own software crashing or your internet going out, unless you can show the failure was genuinely outside your control and you acted promptly once it was resolved. If you're citing this reason, keep screenshots of error messages, confirmation or reference numbers, and timestamps — the IRS wants to see exactly when the system failed and when you succeeded once it was fixed.
There's a separate, related path if the IRS itself gave you wrong advice in writing — see Erroneous Written Advice below; it isn't technically part of reasonable cause, though guides often lump it in.
This is one of the most misunderstood areas of reasonable cause, and it traces back to a single Supreme Court case: United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241 (1985). Boyle drew a precise line that later courts have consistently followed:
In practice: "my accountant said my extension was filed and it wasn't" almost never works. "My accountant told me this type of income wasn't reportable, and that turned out to be wrong" has a real shot — document exactly what you were told, when, and by whom.
"Reasonable cause requests live or die on documentation. Saying 'I was sick' without a doctor's letter gets denied. Saying 'I was hospitalized from March 14 to April 22, 2023, as evidenced by the attached hospital discharge record, which prevented me from filing my 2022 return by April 18' gets approved. The IRS penalty unit reviewer is following a checklist. Give them what's on the checklist."
Write a letter addressed to the IRS Service Center that sent the penalty notice. Include:
Mail it certified with return receipt to the address on your notice. Allow 60-90 days for a response.
If an enrolled agent, CPA, or attorney is submitting this on your behalf, a Form 2848 authorizing them as your representative needs to be on file first — either attached to the request or already on record with the IRS for that tax year and penalty.
This is a template, not a form to copy word-for-word — the part that actually gets requests approved is the specific, documented explanation in the bracketed sections. Vague language in place of real detail is the single most common reason these get denied.
Send it certified mail with return receipt requested, and keep a copy of everything — the letter, the documentation, and the mailing receipt.
The three mistakes that get these letters denied: (1) describing the circumstance in general terms ("I was going through a hard time") instead of specific dates and facts; (2) not explaining what you did once the circumstance ended — the IRS wants to see you came back into compliance promptly, not eventually; (3) sending the letter to the wrong address or without the notice number, which can cause it to be misrouted or delayed past the response deadline on your notice.
Almost every guide online — including earlier versions of this one — treats this as a footnote inside reasonable cause. It isn't. It's a distinct statutory exception under IRC § 6404(f), with its own test, its own form, and its own logic: you're not asking the IRS for mercy, you're showing the IRS gave you the wrong answer in writing and you followed it.
File Form 843 (Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement), checking the box for abatement due to erroneous written advice. Attach:
Unlike reasonable cause, you're not building a narrative around hardship or circumstances — you're documenting a direct chain: you asked, they answered wrong in writing, you followed it, the penalty resulted. That narrower scope is exactly what makes it a cleaner case when the facts fit.
Why this path gets missed: most people who got bad advice from the IRS got it over the phone, which doesn't qualify here — it may still support a reasonable cause argument, but not this specific exception. And most people who did get something in writing don't realize it's the basis for a separate, stronger claim; they fold it into a general reasonable-cause letter instead of citing IRC § 6404(f) directly and requesting this specific relief.
If your situation doesn't cleanly fit this test — verbal advice, general guidance, or advice from a paid preparer rather than the IRS itself — reasonable cause is the path to pursue instead.
Penalty abatement is rarely the complete solution on its own — it works best as part of a sequenced resolution plan. Here's how the pieces fit together:
If you're setting up an installment agreement, removing penalties first lowers the total balance — which means lower monthly payments and potentially staying below the $50,000 threshold for a streamlined agreement that doesn't require a lien.
An Offer in Compromise is based on your Reasonable Collection Potential (RCP) — what the IRS thinks it can collect. Penalties are part of the balance the IRS is comparing against your RCP. Removing $15,000 in penalties before filing an OIC can shift whether an offer is viable.
If you qualify for Currently Not Collectible status, penalties stop accruing new collection pressure — but they're still on the account. Getting them abated before the collection statute expires means less to resolve when you're eventually back on your feet.
Timing matters: Requesting penalty abatement does not stop the collection clock or trigger additional enforcement. But if you are in an active collection situation with a levy notice, get the levy stopped first, then address penalties. Don't let penalty abatement negotiations delay action on an imminent levy.
This is something almost nobody knows: when the IRS abates a penalty, the interest that accrued on that penalty is also automatically removed. Interest on the underlying tax balance continues — but the interest on the penalty itself disappears along with the penalty.
On a large balance where penalties have been accruing for several years, this can be a significant additional reduction on top of the penalty removal itself.
Understanding exactly where FTA and Reasonable Cause come from in the law helps you make the strongest possible request — and understand why the IRS is required to grant FTA when you qualify.
26 U.S.C. § 6651(a)(1) imposes the failure-to-file penalty: 5% per month up to 25%. § 6651(a)(2) imposes the failure-to-pay penalty: 0.5% per month up to 25%. Both are subject to abatement under § 6651(c), which provides that neither penalty applies if the failure is due to "reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect."
This is the statutory basis for Reasonable Cause abatement. It is not a discretionary IRS program — it is a statutory exception to the penalty statute itself. If you meet the standard, the penalty does not legally apply.
First-Time Abatement is not a statute — it is an administrative waiver documented in the Internal Revenue Manual at IRM 20.1.1.3.6.1. The IRM states that the IRS will abate the failure-to-file, failure-to-pay, or failure-to-deposit penalty for one tax period if the taxpayer:
The IRM language is specific: "If the taxpayer meets the criteria... the penalty must be abated." This is not discretionary. A revenue agent who denies an FTA request that meets all three criteria is acting contrary to the IRM, and the denial should be appealed.
"When I call the IRS to request FTA, I cite the IRM directly: 'I'm requesting abatement under IRM 20.1.1.3.6.1. The taxpayer has no penalties in the prior three years, all required returns are filed, and the balance is being addressed via installment agreement.' That specific language signals to the agent that you know what you're doing. Vague requests get denied. Specific requests citing the IRM provision get approved."
The Reasonable Cause standard is further defined in IRM 20.1.1.3.2: "The taxpayer exercised ordinary business care and prudence and was nevertheless unable to comply with the law." The IRM then lists specific circumstances that qualify:
The IRM also lists what does not qualify: reliance on a tax professional who failed to file on time (the taxpayer is responsible for their own returns), lack of funds alone, and ordinary negligence.
Partnerships and S-corporations have an additional avenue: Revenue Procedure 84-35 provides that a small partnership (10 or fewer partners, all of whom are individuals) can avoid the failure-to-file penalty entirely if all partners have reported their income and paid their share of partnership tax. This applies even without an FTA request.
26 U.S.C. § 6404 allows the IRS to abate interest in two specific situations: (1) where the interest resulted from an IRS error or delay in performing a ministerial act (§ 6404(e)), and (2) where the interest accrued on an erroneous refund that the taxpayer did not know about. Interest abatement under § 6404 is separate from penalty abatement and requires a different showing — but is worth requesting when the IRS's own delay contributed to the balance growing.
26 U.S.C. § 6404(f) is the statutory basis for the erroneous-written-advice exception covered above: the IRS must abate a penalty or addition to tax attributable to a taxpayer's reasonable reliance on written advice the IRS itself provided in response to a specific written request. It's requested via Form 843, separately from a general reasonable-cause claim.
This guide was written by Romeo Razi, CPA — a former IRS Tax Examiner in the Individual & Employment Tax Division who applied the first-time abatement rules from the government's side before representing taxpayers in 15+ years of private practice (10,000+ returns). Abatement criteria come from the primary sources below:
Every figure and deadline above was checked against these primary sources at the time of the last update — not against secondary coverage. Tax rules change; confirm current guidance at the linked source (or ask us directly) before acting.
Romeo Razi spent years inside the IRS before entering private practice. He knows exactly what the penalty unit is looking for — and how to make the strongest possible request.
Get a Free Consultation